DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1004
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
DIC
Docket Ne. NR8246-13
3 Jun 14
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 usc 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
2 June 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material
‘submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered
the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1780 PERS-312 dated 17
January 2014, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained. in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
peen denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
it is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
ox other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
Enclosure: NPC memo 1780 PERS-312 dtd 17 Jan 14
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5861 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1780 PERS-312 dated 28 January 2015, a copy of which is attached. NR5861-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5153 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your . New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2400 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1780 PERS-312 dated 1 September 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3551 13
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board cqnsisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies, In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1780 PERS-312 dated 5 September 2013, a copy of which is attached. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9649 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Docket No.NR09649-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5549 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Docket No.NRO5549-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6429 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8534 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, gitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 March 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-312 of ip @ 2 copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1081 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-312 of 2 Apr 14, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8578-13
application for correction Of - your naval record pursuant | to ‘the. provisions of 10 usc L5S20° A three-member panel Of “the ‘Board for Correction of Naval “Records, sitting in executive session, considered ‘your —. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in.